RIVERSIDE HIGH SCHOOL · SYNTHETIC DEMONSTRATION CAMPUS

ADMINISTRATORS - BUILD THE SCHOOL YOU WANT

Uses your school’s actual public baseline to test goals and likely outcomes.

EVIDENCE & METHODSPublic baselineComparative benchmarkingScenario modeling

Choose Campus

County

District

School

1,267 California high-school records embedded

New ADA Value — Year 1 (Per School)

Attendance Recovery + First-Year Reconnection Value

Steady-State Annual ADA Value (Per School)

Assumes reconnected learners remain enrolled an average of 2 years

↗Click to enlarge

1 · SET YOUR CAMPUS GOALS

Active	Outcome	Current	District	County	State	Your Goal	Model Result	Status

Comparison note: District and county attendance are weighted high-school comparisons derived from the public school records loaded in this demo (†). Chronic Absence and district CCI use public aggregate fields. California does not publish a county-level CCI in this dataset.

STAFF CAPACITY Optional maximums apply to new intervention work. Leave blank or enter 0 for no capacity constraint.

Staff Resource	Modeled	Maximum	Status

STUDENT RECONNECTION MARKETING BUDGET

Annual planning estimate · per school

Families to Reach

550

Follows Your Est. IBOD

Mailings / Year

Direct-mail campaigns

Direct Mail

$3,300

550 × 4 × $1.50

TCL Marketing Support

$6,000

Annual associate allocation

Annual Budget

$9,300

Direct mail + TCL support

Includes four direct-mail campaigns at $1.50 per family per mailing plus a $6,000 annual allocation for TCL marketing-associate support. Actual district, postage, production, and vendor costs may vary. This budget is a planning assumption and does not change the simulation outcome formula.

2 · RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN

Read-only. Decision Lab dynamically ranks actions, discounts overlap, and moves to the next action as useful reach is exhausted. Reconnection campaign reach scales with the modeled IBOD opportunity.

Specific Action	Current Reach	Recommended Reach	Recommended Level	Details

PLAN CHECK

PATENTS PENDING

CADATA

California Public Data · Source Verified

School identity and published baseline/benchmark fields are drawn from California Department of Education public data. Decision Lab projections remain modeled planning estimates.

OBSERVED · CDE PUBLIC DATADERIVED · LABELEDMODELED · DECISION LAB

CDECalifornia Department of EducationData & Statistics / DataQuest public reporting ATTAbsenteeism Downloadable DataChronic absence, average days absent and absence-reason files CCICollege/Career Indicator DataSchool, district and state CCI downloadable files DASHCalifornia School DashboardState accountability and continuous-improvement reporting

Provenance rule: observed public values are kept distinct from derived comparisons and from Decision Lab model outputs. A dash is shown when a comparable public field is not available rather than manufacturing a benchmark.

Total Campus LabsTotalCampusLabs.com · homeworkhabit@gmail.com

MODEL SEQUENCE

Moncreiff’s Decision Support Labs · Decision Lab

Administrator Action Report

For administrative review and decisionModeled planning scenario · Validate before implementation

WHY THIS MATTERS

1 · Modeled Outcomes

Outcome	Starting value	Your goal	Model result	Plan status

2 · Why This Plan

3 · Recommended Action Plan

A plan to validate—not a claim about existing program use. Starting participation counts below are demonstration assumptions, not verified usage at this school. A district review would replace them with actual operating data.

Priority	Recommended action	Suggested owner	Modeled starting reach → Recommended reach	Goal support

Reach means people or service units—not hours or dollars. Counts can overlap across actions. Confirm eligibility, actual starting participation and ownership locally.

Weekly intervention estimates exclude setup time and full program costs. Confirm actual staffing and operating duration before launch.

4 · Implementation Snapshot

Prepare

Confirm the scenario, accountable owners, eligible lists, launch date and review schedule.

Launch

Review

Check delivery weekly and early response around Week 4; continue, revise or stop at the agreed cycle-end review.

Use IMPLEMENT PLAN for detailed operating instructions. Record meeting decisions on the following sheets.

Take this scenario to a District Review. Bring the question this report raises; together, we can identify local data, implementation choices and the next decision.

homeworkhabit@gmail.com · DecisionSupportLabs.com · (619) 252-6560

5 · Evidence, Sources & Assumptions

Official school data establishes the starting context. Research informs model development. Neither is a guarantee that a particular intervention will produce the modeled improvement at this school.

Source used	Reporting period	Role in this report

Observed: published aggregate CDE fields where available—not individual student records.

Derived: Average Attendance uses reported average days absent and a 180-day calendar. It is not a published CDE attendance-rate field.

Modeled: starting participation, engagement, response, overlap, workload and projected outcomes; verify locally.

What must be checked locally

Source references
CDE Census Day Enrollment · cde.ca.gov/ds/ad/filesenrcensus.asp
CDE Absenteeism Data · cde.ca.gov/ds/ad/chronicdata.asp
CDE College/Career Indicator · cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/cm/ccidatafiles.asp
NCES ELS:2002 · nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/

Decision Lab is not a CDE, IES or NCES product or endorsement. Source authority does not validate every model assumption.

6 · Decision Record — Decisions & Changes

Use this sheet during the meeting. Record the direction, which actions the team accepts, and what must change. Revise or Hold changes the proposed plan: rerun it before treating the original results as the revised projection.

Meeting date: Meeting lead:

A · Meeting decision — select one

Proceed to validationProceed with modifications Compare another scenario firstHold — more information needed Do not proceed

Decision / direction:

B · Actions — accept, revise or hold

Reach is modeled starting → recommended, not verified current participation. Mark one disposition per action and name the accountable owner. Full unit definitions appear in Section 3.

Action	Modeled reach	Accept	Revise	Hold	Named owner	Launch / target date

C · Changes requested before the next run

Record changes to targets, staff limits, IBOD, response assumptions or action reach. Not every assumption is editable in the public demo.

Item to change	Value / assumption in this run	Proposed change	Owner / due date

7 · Decision Record — Validation & Follow-Through

D · Evidence to validate — assign each needed check

Check	Assumption / evidence to confirm	Owner	Due date

E · District context — District Summary prints separately

Summary reviewedSummary attachedMore schools / scenarios to review

Schools / questions:

F · Follow-up commitments

Next step / required output	Owner	Due date	Done

Decision owner: Next review date:

Handwritten decisions do not update the model or certify funding. Compare actual delivery with this scenario before the next major decision.

District Decision Summary

District Summary

Modeled Year-1 ADA Value

Steady-State Annual ADA

Schools Modeled

0 of 0

Latest modeled school outcomes · Values below reflect completed school scenarios, not current official baseline rates.

High School	Chronic Absence	CCI Prepared	Engaged	Reconnected	Year-1 ADA Value	Steady-State Annual ADA	Last Run

How to read this page: Chronic Absence, CCI Prepared, Engaged, Reconnected Learners, and ADA Value reflect each school's latest completed RUN MODEL. Schools that have not been run are shown as Not Modeled and are excluded from district modeled-value totals. Clear removes only the saved summary result; the school returns automatically after its next completed run.

Year 1 vs. Steady State: Year 1 ADA Value combines the first year of modeled attendance recovery with the first cohort of reconnected students. Steady-State Annual ADA Value reflects the modeled annual value once reconnected students remain enrolled across overlapping school years. The current model assumes comparable new reconnection cohorts each year and approximately two years of retained enrollment. Attendance recovery is not doubled. Values are gross annualized planning estimates before costs.